Where's Maddie !
Case similarities developing !
First and foremost we must remember that, as yet ! Maddie Mc Cann is and, only ever has been, a missing person.
In the same context as applied in, The Falconio Case.
" The Barrow Creek Incident "
No hard and factual evidence that has been produced to support that a crime has actually taken place at the location or, in said vehicle.
With exception to... " Person removed from Location ! "
However it would be prudent to wait until such evidential material and facts are officially released to the contrary.
Therefore the logistics are that, Maddie was removed from the location by person or persons as yet unknown, for reasons unknown.
The number of sightings "after the fact" increase the probability factor in the parents favour.
It is worthy of note that some similarities may exist with that of the Falconio Case.
We must remember, Forensic science plays a vital role that we cannot be without, it is a field within which there is a much needed perpetual advancement.
Unfortunately like any subject there will be errors made and only a fool would suggest otherwise.
However the Low Copy Number DNA Test. (without supporting evidence that could not have been placed at the scene, that is to say that there must be evidence by due process)
Is like a new baby without it's comforter.
It's still teething and it has a long way to go to reach maturity.
So, Who are " THEY " as applied in both cases !
Anon, I don't know Er, Duke
Anon, I don't know Er, Duke of Etc Etc,
but I do Know of Mossad. and THE FACT That.
Elvis's body was found !
Maddie McCann and Peter Falconio have not been !
" They " Implies. Knowing those involved. and or covering up for !
You are not "Anon" your E-Mail is logged !
If Such Evidence Existed in
If Such Evidence Existed in The Hire Car,
Then Two Key Questions Arise,
1. Where was Maddie, Between the time of the incident and, the hire of the car by the McCann's ?
Who hired the car prior to, The McCann's. i.e. pre-incident. during and after.?
Everyone is a suspect !
Everyone is a suspect !
Initally, that is !
However, It is about time we stopped looking at the innuendo's and started to remember, Who the Victim is and, why they would be removed from the location.
Patient with a grudge, Paedophile, Mother without child etc.
It Is, Unfortunate that, The Portugese Police did not apply, The golden hour rule.
Would You "action immediately" if it was your child. if you were in shock ?
All sightings must be "considered" without exclusion.
The time-lapse however, would indicate the need to have a change of appearance, hairstyle and colour, wearing spectacles, sunglasses etc, and or being retained, in a closed environment. (in all probability,) in or near the location of the most credible sighting.
The Key to this Case Is, The Same as it was in, The Falconio Case.
Find "The Victim",
Before you cast Judgement and, Build a case Without proper foundation.
The Mc Canns. Have a right to Live in Hope.
Unfortunately the longer we leave it the colder the case becomes.
Walk a mile in their shoes FIRST.
Note the date of The
Note the date of The Posting above,
You will see that,
I Have used the term "The Victim" in reference to . The Maddie Mc Cann Case.
However in, The Barrow Creek Incident", I used the reference
"The Target Vehicle"
This was due to issues that,
1, I was not permitted to, or it was not prudent to raise in the public domain, prior to trial. in relation to, The Falconio Case.
So In support of Maddie, I repeat,
Find "The Victim" "The Target".
then you can look back and find the enemy who fired the ammo !.
Reference to the article
Reference to the article in,
The, Daily Mirror, Wednesday 26th Sept 2007.
Pages 4/5 image.
Follow the leader, The one pushing the Barrow !
Or get ahead of him.
He cannot hire a car if his name is,
already in the frame.
because it will put him in the same frame thus.
producing a link between, Portugal and Morrocco.
He cannot buy a car as it to, would put him in the frame.
Who's the woman behind him.?
The Target was Slow Moving. towards...?
and may now have gone to ground, in all probability remaining within the operational search footprint.
as defined in the previous article posted above !
Thats what they did !
Thats what they did !
Why would a girl, fitting
Why would a girl, fitting Maddie's general description. Be with an arab man, need to be wearing a black wig ?
This being the 5th sighting in MALTA ?
Reaction time is to slow !
Polygraph - Refusal of
Polygraph - Refusal of :-
The use of the polygraph would play a vital role in the gathering of supportive evidence, in order to build an "Investigative Foundation" in such high profile cases.
This would also aid an investigation, where it would be prudent to establish departmental credibility at a later date, that may affect the trial and also when there is the lack of key evidence that should have been in place as applied in, (Crown - v - B J Murdoch)
To Establish, Perpetrator or Victim in-put without exclusion and, with all impartiallity.
On using, test-string key-questions relating to Identity of the individual sitting the test and the specific case itself.
More so in the cases of missing persons where there may have been a second or third party within the crime scene, and or search footprint.
Would, "The Secondary Victim" take a test to exclude them from the investigation and, if not why not ?.
The priority must be, first and foremost in the best intrest of finding the Key victim,
In this case, "Maddie" Herself.
Credibility needs to be established in all high profile cases from day one in order to prevent. "Cold Case".
While the results of a polygraph test would not be admissable in a court of law as evidence, (Because such test are not considered to be conclusive)
it may still play a vital role in the foundation of Such cases.
The case of, Maddie McCann and, The case of, Peter Falconio.
Relative Key Questions are likely to present 75 percent, similar results.
Missing Persons Protocol, Cross Referenced Article.
How did, Ms Michaela
How did, Ms Michaela Walczuch,
Supposedly have knowledge of Maddie, being at any of the two sighting locations.
If all sightings were after the fact
( i.e. after, Maddies dissapearance )
This establishes therefore that the chain should read as follows.
Without exception or exclusion of.....
Mr Robert Murat - Michaela Walczuch
Dr Russel O,Brien - Ms Jane Tanner
Lwr James Gorrod - Mrs Charlotte Gorrod
Ms Samantha Murat - Mr Robert Murat
Thus providing A Full Chain
Where information may have been innocently passed on, to or from, 1 or more of the personal links in the chain without intent.
Spot on. Why did the Mc
Spot on. Why did the Mc Canns miss-appropriate funds in the first place. Is it not better for a fund to be independenty operated. in order to maintain its credibility or, should I say accountability ( certainly not run by family or friends of the Mc Canns ) There is a point at which the case regretably " Pales into Insignificance" over-kill. So why is it that very questionable cercumstances of The Falconio case, and Mc Cann case become High profile.
Both being very suspicious overseas incidents. over and above those that go missing in their homeland.
1 Question needs to be considered in respect of the Mc Cann Investigation. IF, Mr Mc Canns sports holdall was missing from their apartment. Why did Investigators / Forensic's fail to check the apartments of the remaining tapas seven. As this may account for the gap between the incident and the hire of the car 25 days later. That is not to imply involvment, but to eliminate.
The production of a film would be in bad taste !.
The disappearance of Peter
The disappearance of Peter Falconio has and will always be a mystery unless the true killer comes forth, similar to that of when Azaria Chamberlain disappeared under those horrible circumstances, however in the case of Azaria it was proven that the contemptuous NT Police were out to get Lindy with a "by hook or by crook" mentality,that is why most of the evidence that supported her claim was "lost" in transit on a flight from Ayers Rock to Darwin some days after Azarias disappearance, or fabricated evidence(like the blood stains under the dash) to create the desired outcome.One must realise that we here in the outback are left wide open to unscrupulous Law Enforcement Agencies,Political influences and Bureacrats with hidden agendas that ,in the Territory/National interest control the outcomes of most,if not all judiciary procedures.This unfortunately comes with a twin level government that controls in total, its population.Whether Murdoch is guilty or not is only known to him or the actual murderer but i suspect that as he has admitted to running illegal drugs from SA to WA via the Northern Territory the Law Enforcement Agencies of the NT would make him guilty anyway just like they made Lindy guilty.
However, That is still only
However,
That is still only based on the "assumption" that a murderer even existed in the first instance and, as yet no evidence exists to support that claim.
( At Barrow Creek )
I will stand by this untill, such hard and factual evidence is produced to the contrary.
Because,
The Barrow Creek Incident WAS NOT, The Scene of Crime it was purported to be.

Er, Mossad, Duke of
Er, Mossad, Duke of Edinburgh, Alien lizards, take your moonbat pick...