- warning: Unknown(/var/indymedia/cities.list): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/vhosts/axxs.org/subdomains/arafura/httpdocs/includes/common.inc(1180) : eval()'d code on line 2.
- warning: (null)() [function.include]: Failed opening '/var/indymedia/cities.list' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/share/pear:/var/www/vhosts/axxs.org/subdomains/arafura/httpdocs:/var/www/vhosts/axxs.org/subdomains/arafura/httpdocs/includes') in /var/www/vhosts/axxs.org/subdomains/arafura/httpdocs/includes/common.inc(1180) : eval()'d code on line 2.

In the photograph
In the photograph of Assistant Commissioner John Daulby,
Sat at his desk with the Forensics Examiner Carmen Eckhof
Holding up Joanne Lee’s T-Shirt
You will notice on the white-board, a picture of a Utility Vehicle As Miss Lees Had originally described.
It has on it a “Low Profile Canopy” equal to or less than 5ft 6in.
This is the vehicle that the police should have searched for.
You may have noted that ROB the witness at Bourke stated that he could see over the height of the canopy of the utility thus confirming that this too had a low profile.
He identified the Suspect based on the original description that Lees had given, and also of, Falconio in the same context.
Therefore it would be reasonable to conclude that it too was in all probability the same vehicle.
Although by this time it had a rough paint job “Green”.
Also If the vehicle had a full height canopy this would be at 6ft 6in plus in height and his view would have been obstructed.
In the same white-board photograph the cable ties clearly define that the end tabs were long enough for Self Application and wide enough for the use of the Kombi steering wheel.
The photograph also is displaying, The grazing to the elbows of Miss Lees, and clearly establish that She must have had her hands
“In front of her” at the time she sustained such Injuries, if she was supposedly in the face down position.
Whilst we must consider that the occupant of , The Utility Vehicle at Alice Springs after the Incident, Was “A Suspect”, he clearly may not have been “The Suspect" in this case. as the original description of suspect and vehicle had been changed to suit.
The canopy of this vehicle had “ A Restricted Opening at the sides into which a person is unlightly to have been forced into or at the rear from which a person could escape from Feet First over the tailgate without making contact with the tow hitch and having sustained far more serious injuries.
concluding that none of this could apply in the Falconio case.
It is also worthy of mention that,
While I have given a sunset time of 4.47 pm this applied to, my location on The Stewart Highway, South Australia.
The time of sun-set has been defined as 6.09 pm at Ti-Tree therefore the sun had still set (prior to) the purchase made at 6.22pm.